62209

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

April 22, 2024Judge Page
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedContract Changes / Constructive ChangesEquitable Adjustment (REA)Delay / Disruption / SuspensionQuantum / DamagesAccord & Satisfaction / Release / WaiverStatute of Limitations / TimelinessDCAA InvolvedDCMA Involved

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company sought an equitable adjustment for disruption to fixed-price RERP installation work caused by government-directed over and above repairs to legacy aircraft defects. The Board sustained the appeal, rejected the asserted release and timeliness defenses, and awarded the claimed disruption amount.

Material Facts

  • The Air Force awarded Lockheed Martin the RERP contract to modernize 49 government-owned C-5 Galaxy aircraft, with work primarily performed under fixed-price CLINs.
  • The contract incorporated the H106 Rapid Repair and Response clause, which permitted government-directed repair of legacy discrepancies and provided for an equitable adjustment when an R3 activity increased cost or performance time.
  • O&A repair work was outside the RERP statement of work but was performed through government-approved MDRs, and CAT-2 MDRs were financially the Air Force's responsibility.
  • The H106 and Changes Clauses required an equitable adjustment when a change increased the cost or time required for performance of any part of the contract work.
  • DCMA imposed inspection practices, including a like-new standard and additional inspections of areas unrelated to RERP modifications, that increased O&A work and caused stoppages, reassignment of mechanics, resequencing, and repeated testing.
  • Lockheed Martin could not connect each CAT-2 MDR to each resulting inefficiency hour by hour, but it tracked production and O&A labor data through its accounting and reporting systems.
  • Lockheed Martin's claim used actual RERP touch labor data, a measured mile comparison between less-impacted and impacted aircraft, and adjustments intended to remove hours attributable to causes other than O&A work.
  • DCAA audited and validated the extracted claim data, and DCAA took no exception to the conversion of labor hours to dollar amounts.
  • Lockheed Martin's disruption expert supported the measured mile methodology and analyzed the CAT-2 MDRs for aircraft P-7 through P-27.
  • The Air Force did not present expert or percipient evidence contesting the reasonableness of the added costs and did not call an expert witness to contest Lockheed Martin's quantum evidence.

Parties

Appellant
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Respondent Agency
United States Air Force
Contracting Agency
United States Air Force
Contract Number
FA8625-07-C-6471
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.