Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc.
Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc. appealed a deemed denial of its claim for constructive changes to a contract terminated for convenience. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Material Facts
- The U.S. Army awarded Contract No. W56HZV-11-D-0204 to Globe on September 21, 2011.
- The contract was a five-year requirements contract for M870A4 low-bed semitrailers and related deliverables.
- The contract contained two termination for convenience clauses: FAR 52.212-4(l) and FAR 52.249-2.
- The U.S. Army terminated the contract for convenience on March 11, 2014.
- Globe submitted its termination settlement proposal on November 12, 2014, asserting entitlement to $7.2 million.
- The contracting officer issued a final decision granting Globe $987 thousand.
- Globe appealed to the Board on December 21, 2016, docketed as ASBCA No. 60979.
- Globe submitted a revised termination settlement proposal in June 2017, asserting entitlement to $21 million.
- The TSP II Supplement included a certification of the claimed constructive change costs.
- The government informed Globe that the contracting officer would not issue a final decision, leading to the appeal based on a deemed denial.
Parties
- Appellant
- Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Contract Management Agency
- Contract Number
- W56HZV-11-D-0204
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- Elbit Systems of America-Night Vision, LLCNo. 64450August 11, 2026
- Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc.No. 60979-EAJAJuly 30, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p.A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428July 16, 2026
- Filanc-Orion, JVNo. 63730, 6388, 63928, 63979July 1, 2026
- IVA'AL Solutions, LLCNo. 63430June 4, 2026
Same Year
- Cellular Materials International, Inc.No. 61408December 27, 2021
- Meltech Corporation, Inc.No. 61706, 61768December 17, 2021
- Telos CorporationNo. 62950December 16, 2021
- General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.No. 62180-ADRDecember 13, 2021
- Adjuvant/Capital, LLCNo. 62760December 13, 2021
- Veteran Facility Services, LLCNo. 61855, 61983, 62386December 9, 2021
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction Co.No. 63316, 63397, 63398August 28, 2026