62594

Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc.

January 28, 2021Judge D'Alessandris
Denied / Government PrevailedContract Changes / Constructive ChangesCDA JurisdictionDCMA InvolvedCommercial Item

Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc. appealed a deemed denial of its claim for constructive changes to a contract terminated for convenience. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Material Facts

  • The U.S. Army awarded Contract No. W56HZV-11-D-0204 to Globe on September 21, 2011.
  • The contract was a five-year requirements contract for M870A4 low-bed semitrailers and related deliverables.
  • The contract contained two termination for convenience clauses: FAR 52.212-4(l) and FAR 52.249-2.
  • The U.S. Army terminated the contract for convenience on March 11, 2014.
  • Globe submitted its termination settlement proposal on November 12, 2014, asserting entitlement to $7.2 million.
  • The contracting officer issued a final decision granting Globe $987 thousand.
  • Globe appealed to the Board on December 21, 2016, docketed as ASBCA No. 60979.
  • Globe submitted a revised termination settlement proposal in June 2017, asserting entitlement to $21 million.
  • The TSP II Supplement included a certification of the claimed constructive change costs.
  • The government informed Globe that the contracting officer would not issue a final decision, leading to the appeal based on a deemed denial.

Parties

Appellant
Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contract Number
W56HZV-11-D-0204
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.