626816284362844

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

December 13, 2023Judge Herzfeld
Denied / Government PrevailedContract Formation / ExistenceContract InterpretationAccord & Satisfaction / Release / WaiverCDA JurisdictionSmall Business

The Board granted the United States Army Corps of Engineers’ motion to amend its answer to add an affirmative defense alleging that Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. made material misrepresentations in its proposal. The Board held that the proposed defense was not futile, while leaving for later determination whether the alleged misrepresentations would render the contract void ab initio or merely voidable.

Material Facts

  • The Corps of Engineers and KBR executed Contract No. W912GB-13-C-0011 on July 9, 2013, for construction of an Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System site in Romania.
  • The contract was for a firm, fixed-price amount and KBR substantially completed the project on December 19, 2015.
  • The Corps alleged eight material misrepresentations in KBR’s proposal and asserted that the agency relied on them in awarding the contract and defending the GAO protest.
  • The alleged misrepresentations included representations concerning firm subcontractor and vendor quotes, subcontract terms, the scope and value of USIDC’s work, self-performance of 25 percent of the work, submission of a Technical Assistance Agreement, Romanian labor rates, the availability of the proposed Quality Control Manager, and small-business subcontractor bids.
  • The contracting officer knew of seven of the alleged misrepresentations in 2013 and 2014 while performance was ongoing and knew of the other alleged misrepresentation by 2017.
  • The Corps did not attempt to void or default the contract when it learned of several alleged misrepresentations during performance.
  • The contract included a provision permitting liquidated damages for failure to make a good faith effort to meet small-business subcontracting-plan requirements.
  • KBR submitted a certified claim that the Corps denied, and the Corps later issued two demand letters seeking liquidated damages.

Parties

Appellant
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Contracting Agency
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Contract Number
W912GB-13-C-0011
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.