Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line, Limited filed a request for a decision on certified claims, which led to a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The Board ultimately dismissed the appeal as moot.
Material Facts
- Maersk Line, Limited filed a request for an order directing the contracting officer to render a decision on two December 22, 2020 certified claims.
- The government filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, alleging that only US TRANSCOM was the proper entity to issue a COFD.
- The Board ordered the petition stayed and the motion to dismiss held in abeyance, pending issuance of the COFD by US TRANSCOM.
- The Board stated that if the contracting officer failed to issue the COFD within 30 days, such failure would be deemed a decision denying the claim.
- After receiving no status update, the Board requested the parties provide a reason the appeal should not be dismissed as moot.
- Maersk requested to withdraw the petition and dismiss without prejudice.
- The claim is deemed denied as of September 6, 2021, making the petition moot.
Parties
- Appellant
- Maersk Line, Limited
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Contracting Agency
- US TRANSCOM
- Contract Number
- SPM300-10-D-3373 SPM300-12-D-3571
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Xerox CorporationNo. 63436, 63437November 22, 2023
- Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Space Systems, Inc.No. 63512November 22, 2023
- Pigott Asphalt and Sitework, LLCNo. 63731November 21, 2023
- Delta Mechanical Contractors, LLCNo. 63593November 21, 2023
- Kondazi EnterpriseNo. 63628October 2, 2023
- Fluor-AMEC II, LLCNo. 63554September 28, 2023
Same Year
- Cellular Materials International, Inc.No. 61408December 27, 2021
- Meltech Corporation, Inc.No. 61706, 61768December 17, 2021
- Telos CorporationNo. 62950December 16, 2021
- General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.No. 62180-ADRDecember 13, 2021
- Adjuvant/Capital, LLCNo. 62760December 13, 2021
- Veteran Facility Services, LLCNo. 61855, 61983, 62386December 9, 2021
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026