62905-PET

Maersk Line, Limited

December 2, 2021Judge Shackleford
DismissedCDA Jurisdiction

Maersk Line, Limited filed a request for a decision on certified claims, which led to a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The Board ultimately dismissed the appeal as moot.

Material Facts

  • Maersk Line, Limited filed a request for an order directing the contracting officer to render a decision on two December 22, 2020 certified claims.
  • The government filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, alleging that only US TRANSCOM was the proper entity to issue a COFD.
  • The Board ordered the petition stayed and the motion to dismiss held in abeyance, pending issuance of the COFD by US TRANSCOM.
  • The Board stated that if the contracting officer failed to issue the COFD within 30 days, such failure would be deemed a decision denying the claim.
  • After receiving no status update, the Board requested the parties provide a reason the appeal should not be dismissed as moot.
  • Maersk requested to withdraw the petition and dismiss without prejudice.
  • The claim is deemed denied as of September 6, 2021, making the petition moot.

Parties

Appellant
Maersk Line, Limited
Respondent Agency
Defense Logistics Agency
Contracting Agency
US TRANSCOM
Contract Number
SPM300-10-D-3373 SPM300-12-D-3571
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.