C.J. Mahan Construction Company
C.J. Mahan Construction Company appealed a decision regarding additional costs incurred due to a requirement to employ a sixth crew member for diving operations, which the Board found to be a constructive change to the contract.
Material Facts
- C.J. Mahan Construction Company entered into a contract with the United States Army Corps of Engineers to remove a lock and dam on the Ohio River.
- Mahan bid the contract based on a proposed five-person dive team, which was approved by the government.
- The USACE later required Mahan to employ a sixth crew member when attempting to use a second working diver.
- Mahan submitted a request for equitable adjustment seeking compensation for additional costs incurred due to lower productivity and the added crew member.
- The government denied Mahan’s REA despite issuing a contract modification for another nearby dive contract requiring a sixth crew member.
Parties
- Appellant
- C.J. Mahan Construction Company
- Respondent Agency
- United States Army Corps of Engineers
- Contract Number
- W912QR-18-C-0033
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- Elbit Systems of America-Night Vision, LLCNo. 64450August 11, 2026
- Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc.No. 60979-EAJAJuly 30, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p.A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428July 16, 2026
- Filanc-Orion, JVNo. 63730, 6388, 63928, 63979July 1, 2026
- IVA'AL Solutions, LLCNo. 63430June 4, 2026
Same Year
- Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc.No. 60979December 30, 2025
- Kallidus TechnologiesNo. 61377, 61976December 18, 2025
- Warfighter Defense, Inc.No. 63908, 63909December 11, 2025
- Targe Logistic Services CompanyNo. 63282December 10, 2025
- K2 Solutions, Inc.No. 62768December 9, 2025
- Paragon Defense Solutions, Inc.No. 64307December 8, 2025
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction Co.No. 63316, 63397, 63398August 28, 2026