63466

MVP Network Consulting, LLC

August 30, 2023Judge Shackleford
DismissedCDA Jurisdiction

MVP Network Consulting, LLC appealed a final decision from the Department of the Army regarding a partial termination for cause under Contract No. W911S2-21-P-1765. The Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction due to untimeliness.

Material Facts

  • The Department of the Army awarded Contract No. W911S2-21-P-1765 to MVP for the purchase and delivery of computer monitors and printers on September 21, 2021.
  • The contract included FAR 52.212-4 and FAR 52.233-1.
  • The Army requested a status update from MVP on December 21, 2021.
  • The Army informed MVP on February 10, 2022, that it had received the monitors and requested an estimated delivery date for the printers.
  • The Army notified MVP on March 9, 2022, that it needed supporting documentation regarding the delay or a partial termination for cause would be initiated.
  • The contracting officer issued a final decision partially terminating the contract for cause on July 27, 2022.
  • MVP acknowledged receipt of the termination notice on August 24, 2022.
  • MVP's notice of appeal was submitted on November 25, 2022.

Parties

Appellant
MVP Network Consulting, LLC
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
W911S2-21-P-1765
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.