WINN Solutions LLC
WINN Solutions LLC appealed the Army's decision regarding the termination of their contract, which the government moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The Board granted the government's motion, concluding it lacked jurisdiction over the appeal.
Material Facts
- The Army awarded Contract No. W911S2-23-P-1529 to WINN in the amount of $126,766.44 for the purchase and installation of commercial-off-the-shelf products.
- The contract incorporated by reference FAR clause 52.212-4.
- The Army and WINN agreed to a bilateral contract modification to extend the delivery date from October 13, 2023, to December 12, 2023.
- The contracting officer warned WINN that the contract would be terminated for cause if not completed by December 12, 2023.
- The contracting officer informed WINN of its failure to provide software systems by the required delivery date and stated that the contract would be terminated for cause.
- WINN filed its notice of appeal on January 10, 2024, alleging that the contracting officer terminated the contract for cause.
- The Army later informed WINN that the contract was not terminated for cause and would be terminated for the convenience of the government.
- The government filed its motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction on March 22, 2024.
Parties
- Appellant
- WINN Solutions LLC
- Respondent Agency
- United States Army
- Contract Number
- Contract No. W911S2-23-P-1529
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Kearfott CorporationNo. 64328October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64606October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64651October 1, 2026
- GiaMed Alliance JV, LLCNo. 64484September 29, 2026
- DCS CorporationNo. 64648September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
Same Year
- Red Bobtail TransportNo. FY24-03December 19, 2024
- Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials CompanyNo. 63739-ADRDecember 19, 2024
- Sauer IncorporatedNo. 62302, 62303December 18, 2024
- A Best Services Inc.No. 63816December 12, 2024
- Asturian Group, Inc.No. 63687December 10, 2024
- US21, Inc.No. 63830December 10, 2024
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026