CBCA 1372

Singleton Enterprises

May 12, 2009Judge PollackDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Singleton Enterprises
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Judge
Pollack
Case number
CBCA 1372
Decided
May 12, 2009The decision states May 12, 2009 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Settled
In accordance with the parties having agreed to settle as set forth in the incorporated Release and Settlement Agreement, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interest

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Wayne Singleton
Singleton Enterprises
Luthersville, GA
For the respondent
Harriet M. Deal
Office of the Regional Solicitor, Department of the Interior
Atlanta, GA
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,979 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided May 12, 2009 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

2 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 12, 2009

CBCA 1372

SINGLETON ENTERPRISES,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Wayne Singleton, Owner of Singleton Enterprises, Luthersville, GA, appearing for Appellant.

Harriet M. Deal, Office of the Regional Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent.

POLLACK, Board Judge.

Order

Appellant, Singleton Enterprises, submitted a claim involving installation of shutters at the Cameron Prairie National Wildlife Refuge. On July 16, 2008, the Fish and Wildlife Service issued a contracting officer’s decision allowing in part and denying in part the claim. Partial payment was thereafter made. Appellant appealed the denied portion of the decision. Thereafter, the parties engaged in settlement discussions.

________________________________

2 CBCA 1372

Under cover of May 6, 2009, the parties filed with the Board a Joint Motion for Entry of Settlement Agreement and Judgment, and Appellant’s Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice. The parties request that the Board issue an order entering the settlement agreement on the record and incorporating the agreement into the Board order, granting a consent judgment to appellant for $6171.39 (said sum to be subject to additional interest under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (2006) depending upon payment dates, as set out in settlement agreement). The parties attached to the joint motion a Release and Settlement Agreement, signed by the parties on May 4 and 5, 2009, respectively. That Release and Settlement Agreement is incorporated by reference into this dismissal order. Therein, the Government agrees to pay appellant $6171.39 in settlement of the claim, and in return for the payment, appellant agrees to a dismissal with prejudice from the Board. In accordance with the parties having agreed to settle as set forth in the incorporated Release and Settlement Agreement, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

HOWARD A. POLLACK

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Singleton Enterprises, CBCA 1372. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.