CBCA 1401

Leon D. Dematteis Construction Corp.

Nov 20, 2008Judge SteelGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Not published in the listingGranted in part

Key Facts

Appellant
Leon D. Dematteis Construction Corp.
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Steel
Case number
CBCA 1401
Decided
Nov 20, 2008The decision states Nov 20, 2008 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Patton Boggs, LLP, Westermann Hamilton Sheehy Aydelott & Keenan, LLP
Outcome
Granted in part
Accordingly, the Board GRANTS IN PART this appeal in favor of appellant in the amount of $17 million plus interest under the CDA commencing thirty days from the date of this order.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interest

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
David Westermann, Jr.
Westermann Hamilton Sheehy Aydelott & Keenan, LLP
Garden City, NY
For the appellant
Michael J. Schaengold and Robert S. Brams
Patton Boggs, LLP
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Thomas Y. Hawkins
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,306 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Nov 20, 2008 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

2 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: November 20, 2008

CBCA 1401

LEON D. DeMATTEIS CONSTRUCTION CORP.,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

David Westermann, Jr. of Westermann Hamilton Sheehy Aydelott & Keenan, LLP,

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Garden City, NY; and Michael J. Schaengold and Robert S. Brams of Patton Boggs, LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

Thomas Y. Hawkins, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges SOMERS, VERGILIO, and STEEL.

STEEL, Board Judge.

On November 10, 2008, appellant, the Leon D. DeMatteis Construction Corp., filed an appeal with the Board from a November 7, 2008, decision by a General Services Administration (GSA) contracting officer under contract no. GS-02P-04-DTC-0032(N). On November 18, 2008, this Board received a stipulation for partial judgment which notes that the parties have reached a settlement on claims raised in the appeal as a result of mediation. The parties have agreed to the immediate entry of partial judgment in favor of appellant in

2 CBCA 1401

the amount of $17 million to be paid by GSA, with interest allowable under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 601- 613(2000), commencing thirty days from the date of this order. They have further agreed that they shall not seek review or reconsideration of this partial judgment, and waive their rights to reconsideration under Board Rule 26, rights to relief from judgment under Rule 27, and rights to appeal the decision.

The parties have also agreed to a second partial judgment to be entered upon the completion of the project at issue, in an amount to be determined pursuant to a written settlement agreement. They request that the Board suspend the balance of this proceeding until the amount of the second partial judgment can be determined under that agreement.

Decision

Accordingly, the Board GRANTS IN PART this appeal in favor of appellant in the amount of $17 million plus interest under the CDA commencing thirty days from the date of this order. The Board suspends the balance of the appeal until further order of the Board. The parties are to submit a joint status report no later than December 31, 2009.

We concur:

_____________________

CANDIDA S. STEEL

JERI K. SOMERS

Board Judge

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Leon D. Dematteis Construction Corp., CBCA 1401. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.