CBCA 1704

Heery/PMC JV

Aug 19, 2010Judge McCannDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Not published in the listingGrantedby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Heery/PMC JV
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
McCann
Case number
CBCA 1704
Decided
Aug 19, 2010The decision states Aug 19, 2010 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Kilpatrick Stockton LLP
Outcome
GrantedEntered by agreement of the parties.
Accordingly, CBCA 1704 is GRANTED.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interest

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
William E. Dorris
Kilpatrick Stockton LLP
Atlanta, GA
For the respondent
Kenneth B. MacKenzie and Charlma J. Quarles and Phillipa L. Anderson
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision3 pages, 3,173 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Aug 19, 2010 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

3 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Other statutes1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED: August 19, 2010

CBCA 1704

HEERY/PMC JV,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

William E. Dorris of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Appellant. Kenneth B. MacKenzie, Charlma J. Quarles, and Phillipa L. Anderson, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), STERN, and McCANN.

McCANN, Board Judge.

Heery/PMC JV (Heery) contracted with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for the construction of a 314 replacement bed building at the VA Medical Center in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The contract was designated as V101BC0213. The municipality of San Juan had a construction excise or sales tax which applied to the construction work under the contract. Heery paid this tax to the city of San Juan in the amount of $4,767,025. The contracting officer refused to reimburse Heery for this payment.

On April 1, 2009, Heery sent the contracting officer a claim alleging entitlement to the $4,767,025 which it had paid to San Juan under the San Juan Municipal Construction Tax. On June 22, 2009, the contracting officer denied Heery’s claim.

2 CBCA 1704

The parties have entered into a settlement agreement whereby they agreed to settle the issues in this case including Contract Disputes Act interest, attorney fees, and any expenses incurred in conjunction with pursuing this appeal. The settlement agreement stated:

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and understandings contained herein and intending to be legally bound, the parties do agree as follows:

1. Respondent agrees to pay Appellant the amount of $4,767,025.

This amount represents a complete settlement of the appeal and includes all costs, both direct and indirect, as well as any attorney’s fees and expenses and any interest under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613.

2. The parties agree to the Board’s issuance of a Judgment in Appellant’s favor and shall jointly move the Board for the issuance of such a Judgment in the amount of $4,767,025, to be paid to Appellant from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304.

3. Appellant hereby releases the Government from any and all liability for further equitable adjustments attributable to the facts and/or circumstances giving rise to the appeal. Appellant reserves its rights to claim for: (a) any bond adjustments relating to the above settlement payment; and (b) construction municipal tax on change orders to the Contract.

In their motion for judgment on stipulated settlement the parties agree that they will not seek reconsideration of or relief from this Board’s decision awarding judgment, and that they will not appeal the Board’s decision.

_________________________________

____________________________________ ___________________________________

3 CBCA 1704

Decision

Accordingly, CBCA 1704 is GRANTED. In accordance with the settlement agreement, the Board awards the sum of $4,767,025 to be paid from the permanent indefinite judgment fund. 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2006).

R. ANTHONY McCANN

Board Judge

We concur:

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

JAMES L. STERN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Heery/PMC JV, CBCA 1704. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.