CBCA 1848

Lumetra

Jul 17, 2012Judge McCannDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Lumetra
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Judge
McCann
Case number
CBCA 1848
Decided
Jul 17, 2012The decision states Jul 17, 2012 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Brittin Law Group, P.L.L.C.
Outcome
Settled
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Jurisdiction and timeliness

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Alexander J. Brittin
Brittin Law Group, P.L.L.C.
McLean, VA
For the respondent
Douglas Kornreich and Catherine Graf
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Health and Human Services
Baltimore, MD
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 989 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jul 17, 2012 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 17, 2012

CBCA 1848

LUMETRA,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Alexander J. Brittin of Brittin Law Group, P.L.L.C., McLean, VA, counsel for

Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Douglas Kornreich and Catherine Graf, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Health and Human Services, Baltimore, MD, counsel for Respondent.

McCANN, Board Judge.

Order

On October 31, 2005, the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, awarded Lumetra contract HHSM-500-2006-CA002C for Medicare quality improvement work. On September 24, 2009, Lumetra filed a certified claim in the amount of $1,171,920.19. The contracting officer denied Lumetra’s claim on November 18, 2009. Lumetra appealed.

2 CBCA 1848

On July 9, 2012, the parties signed a settlement agreement and appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal in its entirety. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

R. ANTHONY McCANN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Lumetra, CBCA 1848. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.