CBCA 2278

Associated Builders, Inc.

Jun 13, 2012Judge GoodmanGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Not published in the listingGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Associated Builders, Inc.
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Goodman
Case number
CBCA 2278
Decided
Jun 13, 2012The decision states Jun 13, 2012 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Braude & Margulies, P.C.
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
Pursuant to the parties' motion for stipulated award, the Board GRANTS the appeal IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Jurisdiction and timeliness

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Michael M. Pavlovich and Herman M. Braude
Braude & Margulies, P.C.
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Dalton F. Phillips
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,468 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jun 13, 2012 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

2 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Other statutes1
Agency FAR supplements1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: June 13, 2012

CBCA 2278

ASSOCIATED BUILDERS, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

Michael M. Pavlovich and Herman M. Braude of Braude & Margulies, P.C.,

Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Dalton F. Phillips, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC , counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges VERGILIO, GOODMAN, and DRUMMOND.

GOODMAN, Board Judge.

Appellant, Associated Builders, Inc., appealed the denial by a contracting officer of respondent, the General Services Administration, of appellant’s certified claim in the amount of $497,995. On June 11, 2012, pursuant to Board Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2011)), the parties submitted a joint motion for stipulated award in the amount of $148,602 and a settlement agreement which states in relevant part: [Respondent] agrees to compensate [appellant] . . . a total of $142,012.

In addition to the settlement of $142,012, [appellant] is owed a contract balance of $7,590, which brings the total amount of the settlement to $149,602. The sum of $148,602 will be paid to the Contractor from by [sic] the United States Treasury from the Judgment Fund and the Agency will pay to the Contractor the remaining $1,000.00. The Judgment Fund will pay the __________________________________

2 CBCA 2278

money within 30 days from the execution of this agreement. Interest will accrue on the total amount of $142,012 on the 31st day after the agreement is executed by the parties. In addition, [respondent] agrees to pay [appellant] its outstanding contract balance of $7,590.00 within 30 days after this agreement is executed by the Parties.

Pursuant to the Rule 25(b), appellant and respondent certify that they will not seek review or reconsideration of judgment so rendered. With respect to this decision of the Board issued pursuant to the motion for stipulated award, appellant and respondent waive their rights to reconsideration under Rule 26, rights to relief from judgment under Rule 27, and rights to appeal the decision.

Decision

Pursuant to the parties’ motion for stipulated award, the Board GRANTS the appeal IN PART. Appellant is awarded a total of $148,602. Payment, with interest stated above, may be made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2006). ALLAN H. GOODMAN

Board Judge

We concur:

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

JEROME M. DRUMMOND

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Associated Builders, Inc., CBCA 2278. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.