GRANTED IN PART: January 8, 2013
CBCA 2301
J.E. DUNN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
William F. Cloran of Yazbeck, Cloran & Bowser, PC, Portland, OR, counsel for
Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Leonard E. Lucas, III, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), GOODMAN, and ZISCHKAU.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
J.E. Dunn Construction Company appealed a decision of a General Services Administration contracting officer regarding its claim submitted on behalf of its subcontractor, Tigard Electric, Inc., concerning the Pioneer Courthouse Seismic Upgrade and Renovation Project.
On December 31, 2012, the parties filed a joint motion for stipulated judgment and joint certificate of finality, asking that judgment should be entered in favor of appellant in the amount of $250,000, inclusive of costs and interest allowable under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109 (Supp. IV 2011). The motion provides further that appellant will not seek attorney fees related to the appeal. The parties “certify that they shall not seek review or reconsideration of judgment so rendered.”
Decision
Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Board awards appellant the total sum of $250,000, inclusive of costs and interest allowable under the Contract Disputes Act.
_______________________________
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
We concur:
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in J.E. DUNN Construction Company, CBCA 2301. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.