DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 21, 2013
CBCA 2865
IMMIX TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Tenley A. Carp and Victor G. Klingelhofer of Cohen Mohr LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Josyl L. Barchue, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Eatontown, NJ, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
Order
On June 21, 2012, the Board received a notice of appeal from immix Technology, Inc.
concerning a denial of its certified claim for $1,353,065.39 by a contracting officer of the Department of Veterans Affairs concerning a purchase order placed under a Government-wide acquisition contract of NASA. By submission received on February 20, 2013, the parties state that they have amicably resolved the appeal, with the contractor having received payment of $473,212.86. The parties seek a dismissal with prejudice. According to the request of the parties, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the appeal.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in IMMIX Technology, INC, CBCA 2865. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.