CBCA 2919, 2920, 2938, 3236, 3615, 4800, 4813, 5004

The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company

Feb 28, 2018Judge SomersDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
DecisionGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
Somers
Case number
CBCA 2919, 2920, 2938, 3236, 3615, 4800, 4813, 5004This cell names 8 dockets: 2919, 2920, 2938, 3236, 3615, 4800, 4813, 5004.
Decided
Feb 28, 2018The decision states Feb 28, 2018 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
Holland & Knight, LLP
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
The appeal in CBCA 3615 is GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interestJurisdiction and timeliness

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions. They are ordered strongest first.

Appearances

For the appellant
Andrew W. Stephenson and Gregory H. Koger
Holland & Knight, LLP
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Stacey North-Willis and Eyvonne Alston
Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision3 pages, 4,259 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Feb 28, 2018 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

4 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: February 28, 2018

CBCA 2919, 2920, 2938, 3236, 3615, 4800, 4813, 5004

THE WHITING-TURNER CONTRACTING COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

Andrew W. Stephenson and Gregory H. Koger of Holland & Knight, LLP,

Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

Stacey North-Willis and Eyvonne Alston, Office of General Counsel, Department

of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Before Board Judges SOMERS (Chair), DRUMMOND, and KULLBERG.

SOMERS, Board Judge.

On June 29, 2010, respondent, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), awarded a contract to The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company (Whiting-Turner). Whiting-Turner submitted a certified claim to the VA on March 25, 2013. Appellant thereafter appealed the final decision of October 31, 2013. That appeal is docketed as CBCA 3615 and subsequently consolidated with other appeals under the contract.

The parties elected to use alternative dispute resolution procedures (ADR) to attempt to resolve this dispute. As a result of mediation, the parties negotiated a partial stipulated settlement of CBCA 3615 and entered into a separate settlement agreement that details the terms of the partial settlement of the appeal.

On January 12, 2018, Whiting-Turner and the VA submitted to the Board a joint motion for partial judgment on stipulated settlement. Pursuant to the negotiated partial settlement of the appeal, the parties have settled Whiting-Turner’s claim for extended general conditions and overhead costs extending from May 20, 2012, through August 11, 2017.

In addition to the extended general conditions and overhead costs actually incurred by Whiting-Turner, the partial settlement includes the settlement of the claims for extended general conditions and overhead costs through August 11, 2017, by the following Whiting-Turner subcontractors through August 11, 2017: (a) Lockheed Martin; (b) Radec Corp.; (c) Fingerlakes Construction Company; (d) Monroe Piping & Sheet Metal, LLC; and (e) Pooler Enterprises. The parties have agreed that Whiting-Turner and its subcontractors have reserved any potential claims for extended general conditions and overhead costs relating to any alleged compensable delays extending from August 12, 2017, through final completion of the project (or any portion thereof). In the event that Whiting-Turner intends to pursue any claim for extended general conditions and overhead costs for alleged delays that took place from August 12, 2017, through final completion of the project, Whiting-Turner shall file an amended complaint in the appeal addressing the partial settlement and detailing the additional claimed costs. The parties have further agreed that the partial settlement of the appeal (a) does not settle any other appeals pending before the CBCA; (b) does not settle any existing or potential claims by Whiting-Turner seeking any direct costs (e.g., labor and materials); (c) does not settle the extended performance costs claimed by Whiting-Turner subcontractors Mohlin & Company and RMF Mechanical; and (d) does not settle any direct cost claims initiated by Lockheed Martin.

In their motion for partial judgment, the parties agree that they will not seek reconsideration or relief from the Board’s decision awarding judgment and that they will not appeal the Board’s decision.

Decision

The appeal in CBCA 3615 is GRANTED IN PART. In accordance with the parties’ joint motion, the Board awards appellant, Whiting-Turner, the stipulated settlement amount of five million three hundred thousand dollars ($5,300,000), plus interest as permitted by the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (2012), through the date of payment, with payment to be made through the judgment fund in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012) and 41 U.S.C. § 7108. As set forth in the settlement agreement, the parties have agreed that if the partial settlement is not received by Whiting-Turner on or before January 31, 2018, CDA interest will continue to accrue pending the issuance of the partial settlement payment to Whiting-Turner.

____________________________

JERI KAYLENE SOMERS

Board Judge

We concur:

JEROME M. DRUMMOND

Board Judge

H. CHUCK KULLBERG

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, CBCA 2919, 2920, 2938, 3236, 3615, 4800, 4813, 5004. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.