CBCA 3422

Homeland Security Construction Corp.

Jan 14, 2016Judge WaltersDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
DecisionGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Homeland Security Construction Corp.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
Walters
Case number
CBCA 3422
Decided
Jan 14, 2016The decision states Jan 14, 2016 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
Cohen Mohr LLP
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interestEAJA and fees

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions. They are ordered strongest first.

Appearances

For the appellant
Victor G. Klingelhofer and Andrew K.Wible
Cohen Mohr LLP
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Ricarto Brazela
Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,623 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jan 14, 2016 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

4 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Other statutes1
Agency FAR supplements1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: January 14, 2016

CBCA 3422

HOMELAND SECURITY CONSTRUCTION CORP.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

Victor G. Klingelhofer and Andrew K.Wible of Cohen Mohr LLP, Washington, DC,

counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Ricarto Brazela, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges GOODMAN, KULLBERG, and WALTERS.

WALTERS, Board Judge.

On January 13, 2016, the parties submitted a joint motion on a stipulated judgment, pursuant to the terms of an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) settlement agreement under which they settled fully the above appeal and any and all other remaining claims under or related to the contract that is the subject of the appeal, contract no. VA-245-C-0514, involving renovation at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Washington, D.C. As part of their settlement agreement and their joint motion, they stipulated to an award by this Board in favor of appellant, Homeland Security Construction Corp. (HSCC), in the amount of $3,225,000, with the understandings: (1) that payment of that judgment amount would be made by the Treasury Department on behalf of respondent, the VA, from the permanent indefinite judgment fund; (2) that, if payment is not received by HSCC on or before April 15, 2016, interest on the judgment amount will accrue thereafter at the rate(s) prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury for purposes of the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109 (2012) (CDA); and (3) that payment of any such accrued CDA interest will be made together with the judgment amount.

Under their joint motion, the parties state that they will not seek review, reconsideration of, or relief from the Board’s decision, and will not appeal the decision. In addition, under the settlement agreement and joint motion, appellant has waived any right it may have to interest (other than the aforesaid CDA interest) or to seek recovery of attorney fees and expenses.

Decision

The appeal is GRANTED IN PART. In accordance with the parties’ joint motion, the Board awards appellant, HSCC, the stipulated settlement amount of $3,225,000. Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2014)). Payment of that amount is to be made as described above from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304, together with any CDA interest that may accrue on that amount, if payment is not received by HSCC by April 15, 2016.

_________________________

RICHARD C. WALTERS

Board Judge

We concur:

ALLAN H. GOODMAN

Board Judge

H. CHUCK KULLBERG

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Homeland Security Construction Corp., CBCA 3422. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.