CBCA 3521

Blue Yonder, Inc.

Mar 24, 2015Judge DanielsDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
DismissalSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Blue Yonder, Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
Daniels
Case number
CBCA 3521
Decided
Mar 24, 2015The decision states Mar 24, 2015 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
Cohen Mohr LLP
Outcome
Settled
The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Victor G. Klingelhofer and Andrew K. Wible
Cohen Mohr LLP
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Brian R. Reed
Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Charleston, IL
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,259 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Mar 24, 2015 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 24, 2015

CBCA 3521

BLUE YONDER, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

Victor G. Klingelhofer and Andrew K. Wible of Cohen Mohr LLP, Washington, DC,

counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Brian R. Reed, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Charleston, IL, counsel for Respondent.

DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).

Order

Blue Yonder, Inc., renovated space at the Federal Health Care Center in North Chicago, Illinois, under a contract with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Blue Yonder claimed that due to various actions and decisions by the VA, the contractor was entitled to an increase of $150,213.57 in the contract price and an additional 182 calendar days in which to complete the work. The contracting officer agreed to pay some of the money and afford the contractor some of the time asserted, but otherwise denied the claim. Blue Yonder appealed the decision to the Board.

Following mediation by a Board judge and further negotiations between the parties, Blue Yonder has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, stating that this case has been settled.

The motion is granted. The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

_____________________________

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Blue Yonder, Inc., CBCA 3521. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.