CBCA 4593

EISG, Inc.

Dec 16, 2015Judge DanielsINTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION
DismissalSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
EISG, Inc.
Respondent agency
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION
Judge
Daniels
Case number
CBCA 4593
Decided
Dec 16, 2015The decision states Dec 16, 2015 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Settled
The motion is granted.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
John C. Dulske and Joan Kelly Fowler Gluys and Bryan L. Kost
San Antonio, TX
For the respondent
Matthew A. Myers, Sr. and Rebecca A. Rizzuti
Office of the Legal Advisor, United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico
El Paso, TX
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,106 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Dec 16, 2015 on its own faceRespondent INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 16, 2015

CBCA 4593

EISG, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

John C. Dulske, Joan Kelly Fowler Gluys, and Bryan L. Kost of the Law Offices of Dulske & Gluys, P.C., San Antonio, TX, counsel for Appellant.

Matthew A. Myers, Sr., and Rebecca A. Rizzuti, Office of the Legal Advisor, United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, El Paso, TX, counsel for Respondent.

DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).

Order

The International Boundary and Water Commission contracted with EISG, Inc. to complete the construction of the rehabilitation of the Progresso Levee within the Lower Rio Grande in Hidalgo and Cameron Counties, Texas. The Commission later terminated the contract for default, and EISG appealed this decision.

Through mediation conducted by Board Judge Marian E. Sullivan, the parties settled the case. They have now filed a joint motion to dismiss the case with prejudice.

The motion is granted. The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

_________________________

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in EISG, Inc., CBCA 4593. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.