CBCA 5146

Motir Services, Inc.

Apr 5, 2017Judge RussellGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
DecisionGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Motir Services, Inc.
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Russell
Case number
CBCA 5146
Decided
Apr 5, 2017The decision states Apr 5, 2017 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Termination for convenience

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Marques O. Peterson and Vedder Price P.C.
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Jay Bernstein
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,025 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Apr 5, 2017 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

2 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: April 5, 2017

CBCA 5146

MOTIR SERVICES, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Marques O. Peterson, Vedder Price P.C., Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

Jay Bernstein, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), SULLIVAN, and RUSSELL.

RUSSELL, Board Judge.

Pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109 (2012), appellant, Motir Services, Inc. (Motir), appealed from a deemed denial by respondent, General Services Administration (GSA), of Motir’s claim for payment of costs related to the GSA’s election to terminate for convenience contract no. GS-11P-09-YT-C-0497. The appeal was docketed as CBCA 5146.

On April 4, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation for entry of final judgment and joint certificate of finality, which stated in relevant part: Appellant, Motir Services, Inc. (“Motir”), and Respondent, the General Services Administration (“GSA”), hereby stipulate to the award of $202,165.00 to Motir in CBCA Docket No. 5146. Accordingly, Motir and GSA jointly request that the Board enter final judgment in favor of Motir in CBCA No. 5146 in the amount of $202,165.00.

The parties stipulate that, upon entry of the requested final judgment, all disputes, claims, counterclaims and issues related to CBCA No. 5146 will be fully and finally resolved. Motir and GSA certify that they shall not seek review or reconsideration of the requested final judgment, and that they waive their rights to reconsideration under Rule 26, their rights to relief from judgment under Rule 27, and their rights to appeal the decision.

Decision

The appeal is GRANTED IN PART. Respondent shall pay to Motir the sum of $202,165 in accordance with the parties’ joint stipulation and certificate. _____________________________

BEVERLY M. RUSSELL

Board Judge

We concur:

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

MARIAN E. SULLIVAN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Motir Services, Inc., CBCA 5146. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.