CBCA 5308

Future Forest, LLC

May 26, 2016Judge SheridanDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DecisionGrantedby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Future Forest, LLC
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Judge
Sheridan
Case number
CBCA 5308
Decided
May 26, 2016The decision states May 26, 2016 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
Smith, Currie & Hancock, LLP
Outcome
GrantedEntered by agreement of the parties.
Accordingly, this appeal is GRANTED.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interestEAJA and fees

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions. They are ordered strongest first.

Appearances

For the appellant
Alan I. Saltman and Brian S. Wood
Smith, Currie & Hancock, LLP
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Patricia L. Disert
Office of General Counsel, Department of Agriculture
Albuquerque, NM
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,370 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided May 26, 2016 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

4 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED: May 26, 2016

CBCA 5308

FUTURE FOREST, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Respondent.

Alan I. Saltman and Brian S. Wood of Smith, Currie & Hancock, LLP, Washington,

DC, counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Patricia L. Disert, Office of General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Albuquerque, NM, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), VERGILIO, and SHERIDAN.

SHERIDAN, Board Judge.

In this appeal, appellant, Future Forest, LLC (Future Forest), sought $56,132.49 plus interest pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109 (2012) (CDA), on several unpaid or underpaid invoices submitted to a Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Forest Service) contracting officer under contract 53-8173-4-001, the White Mountain Stewardship contract. When the Forest Service contracting officer failed to issue a timely final decision on the claim within sixty days of receipt, Future Forest filed an appeal from a deemed denial of the claim. 41 U.S.C. §§ 7103(f)(5), 7104.

On May 24, 2016, the parties filed a corrected joint motion for entry of stipulated judgment, stating:

Pursuant to CBCA Rule 25(b), the parties, by their undersigned counsel, jointly move for entry of a stipulated judgment of $56,132.49 plus Contract Disputes Act interest thereon from October 12, 2015. This amount shall be paid from the permanent indefinite judgment fund. This stipulated judgment amount is inclusive of all costs, direct and indirect, including but not limited to any attorney’s fees and expenses . . . .

The parties will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s decision under CBCA Rules 26 and 27, respectively, and neither party will appeal the Board’s decision.

Based on the foregoing, the parties jointly request that the Board grant this Corrected Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Judgment.

Decision

Accordingly, this appeal is GRANTED. In accordance with the parties’ motion, the Board awards the sum of $56,132.49 plus CDA interest to run from October 12, 2015, until payment. Payment may be made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012). This award does not include attorney fees and expenses; the Board understands the motion to state that appellant will not seek such fees and expenses. PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN

Board Judge

We concur:

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Future Forest, LLC, CBCA 5308. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.