CBCA 614, 652, 653

Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.

Jun 25, 2009Judge WaltersDEPARTMENT OF STATE
Not published in the listingGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Judge
Walters
Case number
CBCA 614, 652, 653This cell names 3 dockets: 614, 652, 653.
Decided
Jun 25, 2009The decision states Jun 25, 2009 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, L.L.P.
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
These appeals are GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interest

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Robert M. Fitzgerald and Arnie B. Mason and Michael D. Kiffney and Erica S. Beardsley and Sheila U. Sears
Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, L.L.P.
McLean, VA
For the respondent
John C. Sawyer
Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department of State
Rosslyn, VA
For the respondent
Erin M. Kriynovich and Sarah G. Lounsberry
IE Discovery, Inc.
Arlington, VA
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,332 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jun 25, 2009 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF STATE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

2 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: June 25, 2009

FLUOR INTERCONTINENTAL, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Robert M. Fitzgerald, Arnie B. Mason, Michael D. Kiffney, Erica S. Beardsley, and Sheila U. Sears of Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, L.L.P., McLean, VA, counsel for Appellant.

John C. Sawyer, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department of State, Rosslyn, VA; and Erin M. Kriynovich and Sarah G. Lounsberry of IE Discovery, Inc., Arlington, VA, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), SHERIDAN, and WALTERS.

WALTERS, Board Judge.

These appeals are currently before the Board on joint motion for judgment on a stipulated settlement. The appeals relate to claims submitted by the appellant, Fluor Intercontinental, Inc. (Fluor), in connection with its performance of contract number SALMEC-03–0030 with the respondent, Department of State, for the design and construction of a new United States embassy compound in Kingston, Jamaica. By settlement agreement executed on June 4, 2009, the parties have stipulated to an award by this Board in favor of Fluor in the amount of $7,250,000 in full settlement of those claims and appeals. By their joint motion, the parties have stipulated further that a proper invoice ________________________ for payment of said award was submitted and that interest on any overdue payment under that invoice would begin to accrue on July 7, 2009, in accordance with the provisions of the Prompt Payment Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3901-3907 (2006). Finally, the parties have stipulated that neither party will seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s decision and that neither party will appeal the Board’s decision.

2CBCA 614, 652, 653

Decision

These appeals are GRANTED IN PART. In accordance with the parties’ stipulation of settlement and joint motion, the Board awards appellant the sum of $7,250,000 for all claims under the appeals, payment of which sum is to be made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304. Prompt Payment Act interest on said sum shall begin to accrue on July 7, 2009, should payment of the award not be made by that date.

RICHARD C. WALTERS

Board Judge

We concur:

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Fluor Intercontinental, Inc., CBCA 614, 652, 653. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.