DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 27, 2007
CBCA 715
JOHN McGILL,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
John McGill, pro se, Burlington, VT.
Mark Langstein and Lauren Kalish, Office of General Counsel, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
Order
On April 23, 2007, this Board received a notice of appeal from John McGill (contractor) concerning purchase order DG135006SE2445 issued by the Department of Commerce (Government) and an unpaid invoice. The contractor had submitted an invoice for payment of $10,069.30; the invoice remained unpaid. In a claim dated February 7, 2007, the contractor sought a contracting officer’s decision regarding payment of the invoice. Having not received payment or a decision, the contractor submitted this appeal based upon a deemed denial of its claim.
The contractor timely filed this appeal pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613, as amended. The contracting officer issued a decision; an appeal file, complaint, and answer were filed and served. Issues were focused upon in telephone conferences, and through the exchange of information, as the parties engaged in discussions. _________________________
2 CBCA 715
In a joint motion to dismiss, received at the Board on November 27, 2007, the parties indicate that they have settled the dispute underlying the appeal. They request that the matter be dismissed with prejudice.
Accordingly, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in John McGill, CBCA 715. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.