CBCA 7789

Northland/Cianbro, a Joint Venture

Feb 25, 2025Judge LesterGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
DecisionGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Northland/Cianbro, a Joint Venture
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Lester
Case number
CBCA 7789
Decided
Feb 25, 2025The decision states Feb 25, 2025 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
Pascale Stevens, LLC
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interest

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Howard S. Stevens and Meighan G. Burton
Pascale Stevens, LLC
Baltimore, MD
For the respondent
James F.H. Scott
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,524 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Feb 25, 2025 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

5 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: February 25, 2025

CBCA 7789

NORTHLAND/CIANBRO, A JOINT VENTURE,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Howard S. Stevens and Meighan G. Burton of Pascale Stevens, LLC, Baltimore, MD, counsel for Appellant.

James F.H. Scott, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges LESTER, RUSSELL, and GOODMAN.

LESTER, Board Judge.

On February 10, 2025, appellant, Northland/Cianbro, a Joint Venture (N/C JV), and respondent, the General Services Administration (GSA), filed a joint motion requesting the entry of a stipulated judgment in N/C JV’s favor in the amount of $1,425,000, with payment to be made through the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2018). Although the parties originally indicated that the judgment amount was inclusive of all interest under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7109, that had accrued before the date of the Board’s issuance of the stipulated judgment, they did not originally address whether and, if so, when interest would accrue after entry of the judgment. The parties subsequently filed a clarification, agreeing that, if any portion of the judgment remains unpaid thirty days after the date on which the judgment is entered, CDA interest will begin to accrue on the unpaid judgment amount. The parties have also represented that each party will bear its own costs, attorney fees, and expenses incurred as part of this appeal. The parties have further stipulated that they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, and will not appeal, the Board’s entry of judgment awarding the stipulated amount to N/C JV. See Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2024)).

Decision

The appeal is GRANTED IN PART. GSA shall pay $1,425,000, inclusive of accrued interest under the CDA, to N/C JV in full settlement of CBCA 7789, with each party to bear its own costs, attorney fees, and expenses, with payment to be made through the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304. If any portion of the judgment amount remains unpaid thirty days after the date of this judgment, CDA interest will start to accrue on the unpaid portion of the judgment amount at that time. This payment shall be made in accordance with 41 U.S.C. § 7108 and may be made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304.

Harold D. Lester, Jr.

Board Judge

We concur:

Beverly M. Russell

Board Judge

Allan H. Goodman

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Northland/Cianbro, a Joint Venture, CBCA 7789. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.