CBCA 8314

Caddell Construction (DE), LLC

Jul 7, 2025Judge SheridanDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
DecisionGrantedby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Caddell Construction (DE), LLC
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Judge
Sheridan
Case number
CBCA 8314
Decided
Jul 7, 2025The decision states Jul 7, 2025 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
Smith Currie Oles LLP
Outcome
GrantedEntered by agreement of the parties.
The appeal is GRANTED.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interest

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Jonathan R. Mayo and Randi N. Thompson
Smith Currie Oles LLP
Atlanta, GA
For the respondent
Raul Chiriboga
Office of Chief Counsel, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Kimberly L. Cohen
Office of Chief Counsel, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security
Indianapolis, IN
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,830 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jul 7, 2025 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

3 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Agency FAR supplements1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED: July 7, 2025

CBCA 8314

CADDELL CONSTRUCTION (DE), LLC,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Respondent.

Jonathan R. Mayo and Randi N. Thompson of Smith Currie Oles LLP, Atlanta, GA,

counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Raul Chiriboga, Office of Chief Counsel, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC; and Kimberly L. Cohen, Office of Chief Counsel, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, Indianapolis, IN, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges LESTER, SHERIDAN, and NEWSOM.

SHERIDAN, Board Judge.

On June 18, 2025, appellant, Caddell Construction (DE), LLC, and respondent, the Department of Homeland Security, filed a joint motion requesting the entry of a stipulated judgment in favor of appellant in the amount of $6,324,496.25, plus interest, as authorized by the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (2018), accruing from August 28, 2024. The settlement amount includes all costs, fees, and interest set forth in the settlement agreement between the parties and fully resolves the dispute underlying this appeal. The parties have stipulated that they will not seek reconsideration of, seek relief from, or appeal the Board’s entry of judgment awarding the stipulated amount to appellant. See Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2024)).

Decision

The appeal is GRANTED. Respondent shall pay $6,324,496.25 to appellant in full settlement of this appeal with CDA interest accruing from August 28, 2024, until the date of payment. Caddell waives any further right it may have to claim for recovery of attorney fees, costs, and expenses it may have incurred in conjunction with this appeal.

Patricia J. Sheridan

Board Judge

We concur:

Harold D. Lester, Jr. Elizabeth W. Newsom

HAROLD D. LESTER.

Board Judge

Jr. ELIZABETH W. NEWSOM

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Caddell Construction (DE), LLC, CBCA 8314. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.