A. Montano Electrical Contractor
A. Montano Electrical Contractor appealed a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction regarding a claim for payment for work performed as a subcontractor. The Board granted the government's motion to dismiss.
Material Facts
- The United States Army Corps of Engineers awarded Contract No. DACA01-99-C-0033 for design and construction of replacement family housing at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama.
- A. Montano Electrical Contractor entered into a subcontract with American Renovation & Construction Company to do electrical work on the project.
- Montano's subcontract price was modified to $1,580,678.11.
- American Renovation defaulted on its contract with the government, and its surety took over and completed the contract.
- Montano continued to perform subcontracting work on the project.
- Montano submitted a claim to its surety for $520,303.43, but the claim was not made against the government and was not certified as required by the CDA.
- Montano sought the government's assistance in obtaining relief from the surety for losses allegedly suffered on the project.
- Montano submitted a certified claim to the surety in the amount of $511,040.79 for alleged contract changes.
- The contracting officer informed Montano that the Miller Act governed its remedies and that the government was not a party to the dispute.
- Montano filed a request for help with the Board, which was treated as a notice of appeal.
Parties
- Appellant
- A. Montano Electrical Contractor
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Army Engineer District, Mobile
- Contract Number
- Contract No. DACA01-99-C-0033
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Patriot Construction, LLCNo. 63087-ADR, 63205-ADRMay 15, 2025
- Red River Science & Technology, LLCNo. 63785April 22, 2025
- Teledyne Scientific & Imaging, LLCNo. 62716, 62717February 19, 2025
- Record Steel and Construction, Inc. dba RSCINo. 63639June 24, 2024
- Record Steel and Construction, Inc. dba RSCINo. 63563June 24, 2024
- AVMAC LLCNo. 63747-ADRMay 24, 2024
Same Year
- C.E.M.E.S. S.p.A.No. 56253, 57355December 29, 2010
- Shaw Environmental, Inc.No. 57237December 16, 2010
- Thorington Electrical and Construction CompanyNo. 56997December 13, 2010
- Phoenix Management, Inc.No. 57234December 13, 2010
- Parsons Global Services, Inc.No. 56731December 3, 2010
- Kelly-Ryan, Inc.No. 57168November 29, 2010
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026