56951

A. Montano Electrical Contractor

October 27, 2010Judge Page
DismissedCDA JurisdictionAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

A. Montano Electrical Contractor appealed a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction regarding a claim for payment for work performed as a subcontractor. The Board granted the government's motion to dismiss.

Material Facts

  • The United States Army Corps of Engineers awarded Contract No. DACA01-99-C-0033 for design and construction of replacement family housing at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama.
  • A. Montano Electrical Contractor entered into a subcontract with American Renovation & Construction Company to do electrical work on the project.
  • Montano's subcontract price was modified to $1,580,678.11.
  • American Renovation defaulted on its contract with the government, and its surety took over and completed the contract.
  • Montano continued to perform subcontracting work on the project.
  • Montano submitted a claim to its surety for $520,303.43, but the claim was not made against the government and was not certified as required by the CDA.
  • Montano sought the government's assistance in obtaining relief from the surety for losses allegedly suffered on the project.
  • Montano submitted a certified claim to the surety in the amount of $511,040.79 for alleged contract changes.
  • The contracting officer informed Montano that the Miller Act governed its remedies and that the government was not a party to the dispute.
  • Montano filed a request for help with the Board, which was treated as a notice of appeal.

Parties

Appellant
A. Montano Electrical Contractor
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army Engineer District, Mobile
Contract Number
Contract No. DACA01-99-C-0033
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.