Guy W. Parker d/b/a Parker International
Guy W. Parker d/b/a Parker International appealed the deemed denial of certified claims totaling $2,067,000 under Contract FA8621-04-D-6250. The Board granted the government's motions to dismiss and for summary judgment, resulting in a denial of the claims.
Material Facts
- Parker and the government entered into Contract FA8621-04-D-6250 effective 22 March 2004.
- The contract required Parker to provide a software site use license and supporting services for the Predator MQ-1 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Multi-Task Trainer.
- CO Betty Clingerman was assigned as contracting officer to Contract 6250 in September 2004.
- The government did not issue any delivery order under Contract 6250 for a PMTT software use license or supporting services after CY 2006.
- Parker removed six PMTT hardware sets from Creech AFB without authorization and failed to return them after the government demanded their return.
- Parker submitted a certified claim for payment of invoice SER 0805, which was denied by CO Clingerman.
- Parker appealed an alleged deemed denial of his invoice SER 0805 claim and submitted four monetary claims for equitable adjustments totaling $1,518,000.
Parties
- Appellant
- Guy W. Parker d/b/a Parker International
- Respondent Agency
- United States Air Force
- Contracting Agency
- Aeronautical Systems Center
- Contract Number
- FA8621-04-D-6250
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Phoenix Management, Inc.No. 59273April 8, 2015
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.No. 58343March 2, 2015
- SureTec Insurance CompanyNo. 59343, 59647January 2, 2015
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.No. 58343November 7, 2014
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.No. 58343October 23, 2014
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.No. 58343October 22, 2014
Same Year
- C.E.M.E.S. S.p.A.No. 56253, 57355December 29, 2010
- Shaw Environmental, Inc.No. 57237December 16, 2010
- Thorington Electrical and Construction CompanyNo. 56997December 13, 2010
- Phoenix Management, Inc.No. 57234December 13, 2010
- Parsons Global Services, Inc.No. 56731December 3, 2010
- Kelly-Ryan, Inc.No. 57168November 29, 2010
Same Issue
- Bodell Construction CompanyNo. 63517-ADR, 63850-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Mvation Worldwide Inc.No. 64633August 18, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026