Kaman Precision Products, Inc. formerly dba Kaman Dayron, Inc.
Kaman Precision Products, Inc. appealed the government's termination for default of a contract for bomb fuzes, asserting that the termination was improper. The Board denied the government's motion to stay proceedings except for a specific issue related to bellows motors.
Material Facts
- The government entered into Contract No. DAAA09-96-C-0015 with Dae Shin Enterprises, Inc. for the production and delivery of FMU-143 fuzes.
- The contract included FAR 52.246-11, requiring compliance with specified quality standards.
- The government revoked acceptance of several fuzes due to systemic failure modes discovered during production.
- Kaman contended that the revocation of accepted fuzes was improper and cited various contract provisions.
- The government terminated the contract for default based on Kaman's failures to meet contract requirements.
- Kaman filed notices of appeal regarding the government's actions and sought declaratory relief.
- The government issued a demand for payment of $15,540,158.01 as a result of the termination and revocations.
- The government filed a motion to stay proceedings pending a related False Claims Act lawsuit.
Parties
- Appellant
- Kaman Precision Products, Inc. formerly dba Kaman Dayron, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- United States Army
- Contract Number
- Contract No. DAAA09-96-C-0015
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Kearfott CorporationNo. 64328October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64606October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64651October 1, 2026
- GiaMed Alliance JV, LLCNo. 64484September 29, 2026
- DCS CorporationNo. 64648September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
Same Year
- C.E.M.E.S. S.p.A.No. 56253, 57355December 29, 2010
- Shaw Environmental, Inc.No. 57237December 16, 2010
- Thorington Electrical and Construction CompanyNo. 56997December 13, 2010
- Phoenix Management, Inc.No. 57234December 13, 2010
- Parsons Global Services, Inc.No. 56731December 3, 2010
- Kelly-Ryan, Inc.No. 57168November 29, 2010
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026