563055631356947

Kaman Precision Products, Inc. formerly dba Kaman Dayron, Inc.

July 9, 2010Judge Wilson
Partially SustainedContract InterpretationTermination for DefaultAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

Kaman Precision Products, Inc. appealed the government's termination for default of a contract for bomb fuzes, asserting that the termination was improper. The Board denied the government's motion to stay proceedings except for a specific issue related to bellows motors.

Material Facts

  • The government entered into Contract No. DAAA09-96-C-0015 with Dae Shin Enterprises, Inc. for the production and delivery of FMU-143 fuzes.
  • The contract included FAR 52.246-11, requiring compliance with specified quality standards.
  • The government revoked acceptance of several fuzes due to systemic failure modes discovered during production.
  • Kaman contended that the revocation of accepted fuzes was improper and cited various contract provisions.
  • The government terminated the contract for default based on Kaman's failures to meet contract requirements.
  • Kaman filed notices of appeal regarding the government's actions and sought declaratory relief.
  • The government issued a demand for payment of $15,540,158.01 as a result of the termination and revocations.
  • The government filed a motion to stay proceedings pending a related False Claims Act lawsuit.

Parties

Appellant
Kaman Precision Products, Inc. formerly dba Kaman Dayron, Inc.
Respondent Agency
United States Army
Contract Number
Contract No. DAAA09-96-C-0015
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.