56630

MACH II

January 12, 2010Judge Stempler
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationFailure to Prosecute / Dismissal

MACH II appealed the denial of its claim for payment on an unsigned delivery order under Contract No. SPO500-01-D-0088. The Board granted the government's motion for summary judgment, ruling that the unsigned delivery order did not constitute a binding contract.

Material Facts

  • MACH II was awarded Contract No. SPO500-01-D-0088 on 29 August 2001.
  • The contract required MACH II to supply equipment in response to individual delivery orders.
  • The delivery order in dispute, DO0019, was sent to MACH II but was unsigned by the contracting officer.
  • MACH II shipped six water purification units to the government in May 2008, despite the unsigned status of DO0019.
  • MACH II submitted a certified claim for $238,035.42 on 11 July 2008, asserting that the contracting officer habitually returned signed delivery orders late.
  • The contracting officer denied MACH II's claim in a final decision dated 18 August 2008.

Parties

Appellant
MACH II
Respondent Agency
Defense Logistics Agency
Contracting Agency
Defense Supply Center Philadelphia
Contract Number
SPO500-01-D-0088
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.