States Roofing Corporation

Material Facts

• The contract was under ASBCA No. 54854.
• The initial decision found SRC's interpretation of the contract regarding waterproofing paint to be reasonable.
• The Court of Appeals determined that SRC was entitled to compensation for additional costs incurred due to the government's requirement to use DynaClad flashing material instead of waterproofing paint.
• The estimated reasonable cost of painting was $15,178.00, while the actual cost of installing DynaClad was $120,295.00.
• SRC's recovery was calculated as the difference between the cost of installing DynaClad and the estimated cost of painting.

Parties

Appellant

States Roofing Corporation

Respondent Agency

Navy

Contract Number

N62470-97-C-8319