Whiting-Turner Contracting Company
Whiting-Turner Contracting Company appealed a decision regarding the interpretation of 21 bilateral modifications under a contract with a nonappropriated fund instrumentality, focusing on whether these modifications constituted accords and satisfactions for all claims. The Board granted the government's motion for partial summary judgment in part and denied it in part.
Material Facts
- The Army Morale, Welfare and Recreation Fund awarded Whiting-Turner Contracting Company Contract No. NAFBA1-02-C-0041 to construct an expansion of the Shades of Green Hotel.
- The contract included various standard clauses, including a Disputes clause stating that the contract is not subject to the Contract Disputes Act.
- The parties executed 21 bilateral modifications during the contract performance, many of which included accord and satisfaction language.
- Whiting-Turner submitted a claim for $2,725,415, which was denied by the contracting officer.
- The Board docketed Whiting-Turner's timely appeal as ASBCA No. 56319.
Parties
- Appellant
- Whiting-Turner Contracting Company
- Respondent Agency
- Army
- Contracting Agency
- Army Morale, Welfare and Recreation Fund
- Contract Number
- NAFBA1-02-C-0041
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Alderman Building Company, Inc.No. 58082May 21, 2020
- Naseem Al-Oula CompanyNo. 61321, 61322, 61323, 61324, 61325, 61326December 20, 2019
- Sauer IncorporatedNo. 61790December 18, 2019
- Arab Shah Construction CompanyNo. 61565November 4, 2019
- PIKA-Pirnie JV, LLCNo. 61597November 4, 2019
- Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc.No. 61535July 22, 2019
Same Year
- C.E.M.E.S. S.p.A.No. 56253, 57355December 29, 2010
- Shaw Environmental, Inc.No. 57237December 16, 2010
- Thorington Electrical and Construction CompanyNo. 56997December 13, 2010
- Phoenix Management, Inc.No. 57234December 13, 2010
- Parsons Global Services, Inc.No. 56731December 3, 2010
- Kelly-Ryan, Inc.No. 57168November 29, 2010
Same Issue
- Bodell Construction CompanyNo. 63517-ADR, 63850-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Mvation Worldwide Inc.No. 64633August 18, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026