56319

Whiting-Turner Contracting Company

May 6, 2010Judge Younger
Partially SustainedAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

Whiting-Turner Contracting Company appealed a decision regarding the interpretation of 21 bilateral modifications under a contract with a nonappropriated fund instrumentality, focusing on whether these modifications constituted accords and satisfactions for all claims. The Board granted the government's motion for partial summary judgment in part and denied it in part.

Material Facts

  • The Army Morale, Welfare and Recreation Fund awarded Whiting-Turner Contracting Company Contract No. NAFBA1-02-C-0041 to construct an expansion of the Shades of Green Hotel.
  • The contract included various standard clauses, including a Disputes clause stating that the contract is not subject to the Contract Disputes Act.
  • The parties executed 21 bilateral modifications during the contract performance, many of which included accord and satisfaction language.
  • Whiting-Turner submitted a claim for $2,725,415, which was denied by the contracting officer.
  • The Board docketed Whiting-Turner's timely appeal as ASBCA No. 56319.

Parties

Appellant
Whiting-Turner Contracting Company
Respondent Agency
Army
Contracting Agency
Army Morale, Welfare and Recreation Fund
Contract Number
NAFBA1-02-C-0041
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.