Office Automation & Training Consultants
Office Automation & Training Consultants appealed a decision regarding a wage determination issue under the Service Contract Act, seeking reconsideration and summary judgment on entitlement to equitable relief. The Board denied the motion for reconsideration, reaffirming its previous ruling in favor of the government.
Material Facts
- The Corps of Engineers awarded Contract No. W912P4-05-P-0019 to Office Automation & Training Consultants on 14 January 2005.
- The contract incorporated by reference FAR 52.222-41, which requires payment of minimum wages specified in any wage determination attached to the contract.
- The applicable wage determination was not physically attached to the contract but referenced via an internet address.
- The Department of Labor assessed back pay against the appellant for alleged violations of the Service Contract Act.
- The appellant's request for equitable adjustment claimed compensation for a unilateral mistake in its bid.
Parties
- Appellant
- Office Automation & Training Consultants
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Army Engineer District, Buffalo
- Contract Number
- W912P4-05-P-0019
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Kelly-Ryan, Inc.No. 57168December 5, 2017
- Optimum Services, Inc.No. 58755, 59952July 20, 2017
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 61191, 61192, 61193June 6, 2017
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 58849May 2, 2017
- Swinerton Builders NorthwestNo. 57329April 24, 2017
- General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.No. 60002, 60003March 24, 2017
Same Year
- Joint Venture Makyal Ins. Ve Tic. A.S. & Mehmet Erdal Kamisli Co. Ltd.No. 56956December 28, 2011
- Distributed Solutions, Inc.No. 57266December 28, 2011
- Quimba Software, Inc.No. 57636December 19, 2011
- American General Trading & Contracting, WLLNo. 56758December 13, 2011
- Harry RichardsonNo. 57582December 9, 2011
- Sharp Electronics CorporationNo. 57583December 6, 2011
Same Issue
- Bodell Construction CompanyNo. 63517-ADR, 63850-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Mvation Worldwide Inc.No. 64633August 18, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026