American General Trading & Contracting, WLL
American General Trading & Contracting, WLL appealed the denial of its claims for damages against the Army for breach of a laundry services contract. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss and the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment.
Material Facts
- The U.S. Army awarded Contract No. DABM06-03-C-0009 to AGT for laundry services at five locations in Kuwait.
- The contract was for six months, with an option to extend for six more months, and the total contract award was KWD 2,287,333.24 ($7,887,356).
- AGT claimed the government negligently estimated its laundry needs, which were significantly reduced after the invasion of Iraq.
- AGT's first claim was based on the government's negligent estimate, while the second claim sought compensation for additional services at Camp Victory and 35th Brigade.
- The government moved for summary judgment on both claims, asserting the invasion was a non-compensable sovereign act.
- The Board found it had jurisdiction over AGT's second claim based on an implied-in-fact contract.
- AGT submitted a certified claim for KD 1,271,991, which was later corrected to KD 1,358,241.400.
Parties
- Appellant
- American General Trading & Contracting, WLL
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- Contract No. DABM06-03-C-0009
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- HECO Pacific Manufacturing, Inc.No. 63217, 64512September 1, 2026
- Erik Robinson d/b/a The Artwork FactoryNo. 63727, 63809August 19, 2026
- ACC Construction Co., Inc.No. 63528, 64067July 16, 2026
- Gibraltar-Caddell, a Joint VentureNo. 64379July 13, 2026
- Akima Range Readiness Operations, LLCNo. 64012-ADRJune 4, 2026
- Envistacom, LLCNo. 63796May 13, 2026
Same Year
- Joint Venture Makyal Ins. Ve Tic. A.S. & Mehmet Erdal Kamisli Co. Ltd.No. 56956December 28, 2011
- Distributed Solutions, Inc.No. 57266December 28, 2011
- Quimba Software, Inc.No. 57636December 19, 2011
- Harry RichardsonNo. 57582December 9, 2011
- Sharp Electronics CorporationNo. 57583December 6, 2011
- The Davis Group, Inc.No. 57523December 1, 2011
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026