Sharp Electronics Corporation
Sharp Electronics Corporation appealed a deemed denial of its claim for early termination fees under a GSA Schedule Contract. The Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Material Facts
- Sharp Electronics Corporation appealed from a deemed denial of its claim filed with an Army contracting officer on 14 January 2011.
- Sharp seeks $67,928.63 in early termination fees under the terms of General Service Administration Multiple Award Schedule Contract No. GS-25F-0037M.
- The Army awarded Delivery Order No. W91ZLK-06-F-0028 to Sharp under the Schedule Contract on 1 December 2005.
- The Delivery Order was for the lease, maintenance, and service of copier and multifunctional equipment for the U.S. Army.
- The Delivery Order included FAR 52.217-8, which provided the government the unilateral right to extend contract performance.
- The government continued to use the copiers until August 2009, after the lease extension expired on 1 June 2009.
- Sharp submitted a request and invoice for early termination fees in the amount of $68,317.40 by letter dated 6 April 2010.
- The Army contracting officer did not respond within sixty days, leading to Sharp's appeal.
Parties
- Appellant
- Sharp Electronics Corporation
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- GS-25F-0037M
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Sierra Nevada CorporationNo. 63649February 24, 2026
- Sierra Nevada CorporationNo. 63933, 63934February 24, 2026
- Synergetic Technologies Group, Inc.No. 64361January 29, 2026
- Repeat Consultants International, LLCNo. 64188, 64189December 8, 2025
- Novielli Boat Builders Inc.No. 64281December 5, 2025
- United Capital Investments GroupNo. 64163December 2, 2025
Same Year
- Joint Venture Makyal Ins. Ve Tic. A.S. & Mehmet Erdal Kamisli Co. Ltd.No. 56956December 28, 2011
- Distributed Solutions, Inc.No. 57266December 28, 2011
- Quimba Software, Inc.No. 57636December 19, 2011
- American General Trading & Contracting, WLLNo. 56758December 13, 2011
- Harry RichardsonNo. 57582December 9, 2011
- The Davis Group, Inc.No. 57523December 1, 2011
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026