57817

DODS, Inc.

June 18, 2012Judge Clarke
Denied / Government PrevailedAccord & Satisfaction / Release / WaiverContract InterpretationDCMA Involved

DODS, Inc. appealed the termination of a unilateral purchase order, claiming government delays caused its failure to deliver. The Board denied the appeal, concluding that the purchase order lapsed due to DODS' failure to perform.

Material Facts

  • On 6 January 2011, DLA issued request for quotations No. SPM4A7-11-Q-3650 for one aircraft stiffener.
  • DODS submitted a quote on 12 January 2011, agreeing to deliver a first article sample within 90 days and a production unit within 180 days.
  • Purchase Order No. SPM4A7-11-M-K222 was issued to DODS on 4 March 2011, requiring delivery of the first article by 5 June 2011.
  • DODS did not begin work on the contract until 12 May 2011, 69 days after the award.
  • DODS failed to deliver the first article by the required date of 5 June 2011.
  • The government issued Modification No. POOOO 1 on 10 June 2011, cancelling PO K222 due to DODS' failure to meet the delivery date.
  • DODS submitted a claim for termination for convenience on 9 August 2011, which was denied by the contracting officer.

Parties

Appellant
DODS, Inc.
Contracting Agency
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation
Contract Number
SPM4A7-11-M-K222
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.