57547

EJB Facilities Services

March 8, 2012Judge Tunks
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

EJB Facilities Services appealed a decision regarding a deduction for deleted work under a Navy contract, claiming improper calculation of the deduction. The Board denied both parties' motions for summary judgment due to disputed material facts.

Material Facts

  • The Navy issued Request for Proposals (RFP) No. N44255-04-R-0003 for a combination firm fixed-price/indefinite-quantity contract.
  • The contract was awarded to EJB in the amount of $405,270,351.64.
  • The contract incorporated FAR 52.233-1, DISPUTES and FAR 52.243-1, CHANGES-FIXED-PRICE by reference.
  • The Navy requested EJB to submit a proposal for deleting Annex 1000000 (Supply) in its entirety.
  • EJB proposed a price reduction of $331,137.92 based on its actual historical costs.
  • The contracting officer issued unilateral Modification No. A00049, deleting Annex 1000000 and reducing the contract price by $1,375,833.80.
  • EJB submitted a claim to the contracting officer requesting an adjustment of Modification No. A00049.
  • The contracting officer denied the claim, stating the proper measure of a downward adjustment was the contract item price.

Parties

Appellant
EJB Facilities Services
Respondent Agency
Department of the Navy
Contract Number
N44255-05-D-5103
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.