General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc.
General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc. sought sanctions against the Army for refusing to comply with Board orders requiring limited disclosure of disputed trade-secret documents under a protective order. The Board declined to sustain the appeals or conclusively establish that the contract was a requirements contract, but granted the sanctions motion to the extent that it drew a conclusive adverse inference concerning the Army's preparation of solicitation estimates.
Material Facts
- The contract was to make the appellant a second source for supplying small caliber ammunition to the Department of the Army for a base year plus option years.
- Alliant Techsystems, Inc. was the Army's primary supplier.
- The appellant's claim was based on alleged inadequate government estimates of ammunition quantities and sought recovery of unanticipated costs.
- The disputed Rule 4 documents referred to Alliant Techsystems, Inc.'s unit prices and production capacity and to information from which those matters could be derived.
- The Board determined that the disputed documents were trade secrets but relevant to the appellant's case for discovery purposes.
- The Army refused to confer on a protective order, submit proposed protective-order terms, or disclose the disputed documents to appellant's counsel under the Board's protective order.
- The Army provided the disputed documents to the Board for in-camera inspection but produced the documents to the appellant in redacted form.
- The Army's internal estimator stated that the government considered Lake City Army Ammunition Plant capacities in developing Best Estimated Quantities.
- The Army did not timely provide responses to the appellant's discovery requests and provided the discovery only after the appellant filed a motion to compel.
Parties
- Appellant
- General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contracting Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W52PIJ-05-G-0002
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.No. 59357, 59358August 29, 2016
- GSC Construction, Inc.No. 59644, 59956, 60069, 60070, 60112, 60113June 21, 2016
- Access Personnel Services, Inc.No. 59900June 15, 2016
- CI², Inc.No. 59948June 6, 2016
- CI², Inc.No. 59948June 6, 2016
- CI², Inc.No. 59948June 6, 2016
Same Year
- Gray Personnel, Inc.No. 54652, 55833December 31, 2012
- ECC, InternationalNo. 55781December 28, 2012
- DODS, Inc.December 18, 2012
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 57576, 57679December 17, 2012
- TMS Envirocon, Inc.December 12, 2012
- The Public Warehousing CompanyDecember 3, 2012
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- DCS CorporationNo. 64648September 22, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction Co.No. 63316, 63397, 63398August 28, 2026