5687056957

General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc.

February 3, 2012Judge Delman
Partially SustainedQuantum / Damages

General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc. sought sanctions against the Army for refusing to comply with Board orders requiring limited disclosure of disputed trade-secret documents under a protective order. The Board declined to sustain the appeals or conclusively establish that the contract was a requirements contract, but granted the sanctions motion to the extent that it drew a conclusive adverse inference concerning the Army's preparation of solicitation estimates.

Material Facts

  • The contract was to make the appellant a second source for supplying small caliber ammunition to the Department of the Army for a base year plus option years.
  • Alliant Techsystems, Inc. was the Army's primary supplier.
  • The appellant's claim was based on alleged inadequate government estimates of ammunition quantities and sought recovery of unanticipated costs.
  • The disputed Rule 4 documents referred to Alliant Techsystems, Inc.'s unit prices and production capacity and to information from which those matters could be derived.
  • The Board determined that the disputed documents were trade secrets but relevant to the appellant's case for discovery purposes.
  • The Army refused to confer on a protective order, submit proposed protective-order terms, or disclose the disputed documents to appellant's counsel under the Board's protective order.
  • The Army provided the disputed documents to the Board for in-camera inspection but produced the documents to the appellant in redacted form.
  • The Army's internal estimator stated that the government considered Lake City Army Ammunition Plant capacities in developing Best Estimated Quantities.
  • The Army did not timely provide responses to the appellant's discovery requests and provided the discovery only after the appellant filed a motion to compel.

Parties

Appellant
General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contracting Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
W52PIJ-05-G-0002
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.