International Oil Trading Company
International Oil Trading Company appealed the denial of claims totaling $74.7 million for fuel delivered under two contracts, seeking partial summary judgment on contract interpretation issues. The Board granted the motion in part, addressing the applicable methods for determining fuel quantity.
Material Facts
- The government awarded IOTC Contract 0483 for delivery of fuel to military installations in Iraq on an indefinite delivery basis.
- The contract specified fixed prices for gallons of fuel delivered and had a total estimated value at award of $456,802,652.89.
- The Quantity Determination clause outlined methods for determining the quantity of fuel delivered.
- Fuel was loaded into IOTC tank trucks in Jordan and weighed by customs officials.
- IOTC prepared Fuel Delivery and Acceptance Forms for each load, which included the fuel weight and conversion to U.S. gallons.
- The government accepted the Aqaba weighbridge measurements at the discharge sites, despite the absence of temperature compensating meters.
- IOTC's claims for underpayment were based on discrepancies between the loaded quantities and the government-reported quantities.
- The contracting officer denied IOTC's claims entirely in a final decision dated 17 November 2010.
Parties
- Appellant
- International Oil Trading Company
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Logistics Agency-Energy
- Contracting Agency
- Defense Energy Support Center
- Contract Number
- SP0600-07-D-0483
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Phoenix Management, Inc.No. 59273April 8, 2015
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.No. 58343March 2, 2015
- SureTec Insurance CompanyNo. 59343, 59647January 2, 2015
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.No. 58343November 7, 2014
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.No. 58343October 23, 2014
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.No. 58343October 22, 2014
Same Year
- Gray Personnel, Inc.No. 54652, 55833December 31, 2012
- ECC, InternationalNo. 55781December 28, 2012
- DODS, Inc.December 18, 2012
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 57576, 57679December 17, 2012
- TMS Envirocon, Inc.December 12, 2012
- The Public Warehousing CompanyDecember 3, 2012
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026