56358

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

April 2, 2012Judge Freeman
Partially SustainedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Contract InterpretationQuantum / DamagesDCAA Involved

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. appealed the deemed denial of its claim for reimbursement of costs associated with private security used by a subcontractor under a cost reimbursement contract. The Board denied both cross-motions for summary judgment because the contract did not categorically prohibit armed private security, but genuine issues of material fact remained regarding regulatory compliance and the reasonableness of the security component.

Material Facts

  • The Army Sustainment Center awarded Contract 0007 to KBRS as a cost plus award fee, indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contract implementing LOGCAP.
  • The contract included FAR 52.216-7, ALLOWABLE COST AND PAYMENT, and special provisions H-13, H-16, and H-21.
  • The contract required operation of military dining facilities at locations in Iraq and Kuwait.
  • ESS operated the dining facilities and later performed under 11 subcontracts awarded by KBRS.
  • The 11 ESS subcontracts used firm-fixed unit prices that included an amount for security.
  • ESS used private security for expatriate movements, third-country-national movements, and movement of equipment and supplies.
  • CPA Order Number 3 (Revised) (Amended) addressed private security firms' possession and use of firearms and military weapons.
  • CPA Memorandum Number 17 established registration requirements for private security companies operating in Iraq.
  • The Defense Contract Audit Agency issued a notice suspending and disapproving the questioned ESS subcontract costs.
  • KBRS submitted a certified claim for non-payment of the suspended costs, and no contracting officer's decision was issued.

Parties

Appellant
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Army
Contracting Agency
Army Sustainment Center (ASC)
Contract Number
DAAA09-02-D-0007
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.