57574

Trace Systems Inc.

May 25, 2012Judge Park-Conroy
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

Trace Systems Inc. appealed a contracting officer's decision regarding the reimbursement of travel expenses under Contract No. W91B4N-10-C-5007. The Board denied the appeal, concluding that Trace did not demonstrate reliance on its interpretation of the contract.

Material Facts

  • Trace was awarded Contract No. W91B4N-10-C-5007 for five subject matter experts who were to provide network infrastructure support and audio visual support for the Camp Sabalu Detention Facility in Parwan at Bagram, Afghanistan.
  • The Army reimbursed Trace $15,191.80 under contract line item (CLIN) 0007 for mobilization air travel incurred for four of its contract employees.
  • The Army would not reimburse $5,051.20 in R&R air travel expenses for two of the employees.
  • Trace submitted a claim to the contracting officer seeking an interpretation of the contract regarding the non-payment of travel-related expenses.
  • The contracting officer issued a final decision stating that R&R travel is not considered official travel and cannot be billed under CLIN 0007.

Parties

Appellant
Trace Systems Inc.
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
W91B4N-10-C-5007
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.