Tri-County Contractors, Inc.
Tri-County Contractors, Inc. appealed the contracting officer's denial of its claim for equitable adjustment under Contract No. N69450-10-C-3597. The Board denied the government's motion for summary judgment based on a release and final payment.
Material Facts
- Tri-County entered into Contract No. N69450-10-C-3597 to replace NCBC Building 400's oil and lubricating system for a firm fixed-price of $618,304.00.
- The contract incorporated the FAR 52.232-5 clause regarding payments under fixed-price construction contracts.
- Tri-County submitted a request for equitable adjustment seeking $156,150.80 and 49 days delay regarding underground double wall piping.
- Tri-County later submitted a revised claim for $242,830.00 for its underground piping claim, which included direct material costs, labor, equipment, and overhead costs.
- Tri-County executed a final release to obtain the final payment of $9,676.85 on the contract.
- The government paid the final balance of $9,676.85 to Tri-County on 17 January 2012.
- The contracting officer stated that the FAR 52.232-5(h)(3) clause does not allow payment of claims not specifically exempted from the operation of the contractor's final release.
Parties
- Appellant
- Tri-County Contractors, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Navy
- Contracting Agency
- NAVFAC
- Contract Number
- N69450-10-C-3597
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- PAW & Associates, LLCNo. 58534August 20, 2015
- DayDanyon CorporationNo. 57681August 17, 2015
- DynPort Vaccine Company LLCNo. 59298August 12, 2015
- Tri-County Contractors, Inc.No. 58167June 16, 2015
- Linc Government Services, LLCNo. 58565June 16, 2015
- SUFI Network Services, Inc.No. 55306May 20, 2015
Same Year
- WorleyParsons International, Inc.No. 57930December 20, 2013
- TTF, L.L.C.No. 58452December 19, 2013
- Bruce E. ZoellerNo. 56578December 17, 2013
- New Iraq Ahd CompanyNo. 58800December 17, 2013
- Linc Government Services, LLCNo. 58561, 58562, 58563, 58565, 58566, 58567December 5, 2013
- Fluor CorporationNo. 57852December 5, 2013
Same Issue
- Bodell Construction CompanyNo. 63517-ADR, 63850-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Mvation Worldwide Inc.No. 64633August 18, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026