56758

American General Trading & Contracting, WLL

April 23, 2014Judge Melnick
Partially SustainedContract InterpretationAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

American General Trading & Contracting, WLL appealed a denial of its claim against the U.S. Army regarding a contract for laundry services, alleging negligent estimation of needs and breach of an implied-in-fact contract. The Board denied the government's motion for summary judgment on the negligent estimate claim but granted it on the implied-in-fact contract claim.

Material Facts

  • AGT was awarded Contract No. DABM06-03-C-0009 to provide laundry services at five military camps in Kuwait.
  • AGT alleges the Army negligently estimated its laundry needs, which were significantly reduced due to the invasion of Iraq.
  • AGT also claims it entered into an implied-in-fact contract to provide services at two additional camps, Victory and 35th Brigade.
  • The contract was a firm-fixed unit-priced contract with payment based on the actual number of items laundered.
  • AGT submitted a certified claim for KD 1,271,991, later corrected to KD 1,358,241.400, which was denied by the contracting officer.

Parties

Appellant
American General Trading & Contracting, WLL
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army
Contract Number
Contract No. DABM06-03-C-0009
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.