5753058161

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

November 19, 2018Judge Melnick
Denied / Government PrevailedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Quantum / DamagesContract Changes / Constructive ChangesEquitable Adjustment (REA)Delay / Disruption / SuspensionContract InterpretationDCAA InvolvedDCMA InvolvedCommercial Item

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. sought reimbursement under its LOGCAP III contract for amounts paid to a subcontractor in settlements of delay and double-handling requests for equitable adjustment. The Board denied both appeals because KBR failed to demonstrate that the settlement costs were reasonable.

Material Facts

  • LOGCAP III required KBR to perform support services for the government in Iraq through individual task orders.
  • Task Order 59 was a cost-plus-fixed-fee order, and Change 5 required KBR to provide living accommodations at multiple Iraqi locations.
  • KBR and First Kuwaiti executed a firm-fixed-price subcontract for the procurement and delivery of 2,252 trailers to Camp Anaconda, later adding 1,760 trailers for Camp Victory.
  • The subcontract required equitable-adjustment proposals to include detailed cost breakdowns conforming to FAR Part 31 and required First Kuwaiti to maintain supporting books and records.
  • Military convoy resources were limited, security threats disrupted convoy movement, and trailers accumulated at the Kuwait-Iraq border.
  • KBR and First Kuwaiti extended the subcontract performance period through August 1, 2004 to address trailer backups.
  • First Kuwaiti submitted delay and double-handling requests using rates, prices, and a modeled number of delay days rather than actual costs.
  • KBR paid both settlements without obtaining adequate cost information from First Kuwaiti, except for information concerning the land lease.
  • DCAA audited the settlements and ultimately disapproved $51,273,482, after which the government recovered what it had paid.
  • The ACO's final decision recognized the land-lease cost with indirect costs and fee but otherwise denied KBR's reimbursement request.

Parties

Appellant
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contract Number
DAAA09-02-D-0007
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.