5802858794

Lockheed Martin Services, Inc.

December 8, 2015Judge Clarke
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Quantum / DamagesContract InterpretationGovernment-Furnished PropertyPayment / Progress Payments / FinancingDCAA Involved

Lockheed Martin Services, Inc. appealed DFAS decisions concerning payment for the RAPID system developed to replace the MIRORS system and DFAS's demand for return of a license fee. The Board sustained both appeals, holding that RAPID was not government-furnished equipment, that H.10 did not require a no-cost license for RAPID, and that LMSI was entitled to the remaining capped amount.

Material Facts

  • DFAS awarded the contract to ACS Government Solutions Group, Inc., for performance of the Defense Retired/Annuitant Pay System.
  • The contract distinguished among government-furnished equipment, government-furnished property, and government-furnished services, and listed the DRAS Automated Information System as government-furnished property.
  • MIRORS was approximately ten years old when ACS began performance, experienced increasing hardware failures, and was no longer supported by its manufacturer.
  • The contract did not require ACS to replace MIRORS, and DFAS refused to pay for development of a MIRORS replacement when ACS requested payment.
  • LMSI purchased ACS and developed RAPID using DOE-owned E-STARS software and LMSI-owned derivative software.
  • LMSI implemented RAPID in December 2004 and used it for approximately five years before DFAS decided to bring the work back in-house.
  • DFAS requested a DCAA audit of the RAPID portion of LMSI's transition proposal.
  • Modification No. P00089 paid LMSI a portion of the RAPID costs, included a capped amount, and provided for price redetermination or repayment if the government had overpaid.
  • LMSI submitted a certification stating that the questioned original-investment costs had not previously been billed or charged to DFAS or another United States Government entity.
  • The original development cost of RAPID was documented through an amortization table, and LMSI paid that cost out of profits from Contract 0002.
  • Hanford estimated that 25 percent of identified labor costs related to RAPID enhancements, producing the enhancement amount used by the Board.
  • DFAS issued Modification No. P00092 reducing the user-license fee to zero and asserting that LMSI was indebted to DFAS for that amount.

Parties

Appellant
Lockheed Martin Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Defense Finance & Accounting Service
Contracting Agency
Defense Finance & Accounting Service
Contract Number
MDA220-0l-D-0002
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.