5802858794

Lockheed Martin Services, Inc.

April 25, 2016Judge Clarke
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedContract InterpretationGovernment-Furnished PropertyQuantum / DamagesDCAA Involved

The Board denied the Defense Finance & Accounting Service's motion for reconsideration of a prior decision sustaining Lockheed Martin Services, Inc.'s appeals concerning payment for a license fee related to DFAS's use of software developed by LMSI. The Board concluded that any factual mischaracterization concerning the relationship between MIRORS and DRAS was harmless, that MIRORS was Government Furnished Property rather than Government-Furnished Equipment, and that the quantum challenge presented no new persuasive evidence.

Material Facts

  • LMSI performed the Military Retired and Annuitant Pay Operations contract for DFAS.
  • The contract included section J.4.6, titled "LIST OF PROPERTIES, FACILITIES, MATERIALS AND SERVICES OFFERED BY THE GOVERNMENT."
  • Section J.4.6 identified MIRORS and the DRAS Automated Information System as Government Furnished Property.
  • MIRORS worked in conjunction with DRAS.
  • The prior decision awarded LMSI payment for a license fee related to DFAS's use of LMSI-developed software.
  • DFAS relied on a DCAA audit in challenging the prior quantum determination.
  • The prior decision stated that LMSI incurred unrecovered costs to develop RAPID exceeding the unpaid difference between the contract cap and the amount paid by Modification No. P00089.

Parties

Appellant
Lockheed Martin Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Defense Finance & Accounting Service
Contract Number
MDA220-01-D-0002
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.