Precision Standard, Inc.
Precision Standard, Inc. appealed a termination for default and a breach of warranty claim related to a contract for aircraft skins. The Board granted the government's motion for summary judgment on the termination for default and denied the cross-motions regarding the warranty claim.
Material Facts
- The contract required the manufacture and delivery of 138 aircraft skins for the A-10 aircraft at a price of $395 per skin.
- The total price of the contract, including the separately-priced first article, was $57,010.
- PSI did not ship the first article and first article test report to DLA until 7 September 2010.
- On 19 May 2011, PSI advised that it would not deliver the entire quantity of 138 skins on the 24 June 2011 due date.
- On 16 June 2011, a Product Quality Deficiency Report found 'Bad Spot Welds' on an aircraft skin delivered by PSI.
- The government issued a Notice of Revocation of Acceptance and Breach of Warranty to PSI on 5 October 2011.
- On 23 March 2012, DLA terminated the contract for default based on PSI's failure to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.
Parties
- Appellant
- Precision Standard, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Contracting Agency
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Contract Number
- SPM4A7-08-M-9187
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- ECC International, LLCNo. 58993, 60167, 60283February 24, 2022
- ECC International, LLCNo. 60167January 25, 2022
- General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.No. 62180-ADRDecember 13, 2021
- Sungjee Construction Co., Ltd.No. 62002, 62170March 23, 2021
- General AtomicsNo. 61495January 5, 2021
- Engility LLCNo. 61281August 11, 2020
Same Year
- Sparton DeLeon Springs, LLCNo. 60416December 28, 2016
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.No. 59873, 60885December 21, 2016
- Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems, Inc.No. 59508, 59509December 20, 2016
- CDM Constructors, Inc.No. 59524December 20, 2016
- Astro Systems, Inc.No. 60769, 60781December 20, 2016
- First Division Design, LLCNo. 60884-975December 15, 2016
Same Issue
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64032, 64111, 64230, 64231, 64517August 24, 2026
- Visionary Construction, Inc. dba Visionary ServicesNo. 64426August 20, 2026
- Peritia LLCNo. 64495, 64586August 20, 2026
- J.A.M. Construction Services, Inc.No. 63378, 64226, 64439July 28, 2026