633786422664439

J.A.M. Construction Services, Inc.

July 28, 2026Judge Stinson
Partially SustainedTermination for DefaultLiquidated DamagesDelay / Disruption / SuspensionContract Interpretation

J.A.M. Construction Services, Inc. challenged the government's termination of a firm-fixed-price construction task order for default and assessment of liquidated damages, asserting that excusable and government-caused delays excused its performance. On the government's motion for summary judgment, the Board granted partial summary judgment on the validity of the default termination but denied summary judgment on JAM's affirmative defense of excusable delay.

Material Facts

  • The contract was a Design-Bid-Build, Firm-Fixed Price, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity, Multiple Award Construction Contract between JAM and NAVFAC Southeast.
  • NAVFAC Southeast issued JAM a task order for construction of an elevator lobby addition to Building 2945 at Naval Air Station Whiting Field.
  • The task order performance period was 275 calendar days.
  • The task order required multiple submittals, including a construction progress schedule, network analysis schedule, quality control plan, and environmental protection plan, before onsite work could begin.
  • The government advised JAM that unacceptable submittals and slow progress were delaying performance.
  • JAM's project superintendent resigned, both subcontractors left the jobsite, and JAM had no workers at the site other than personnel removing equipment.
  • JAM left the project site in February 2022 and did not return before the government's termination.
  • JAM asserted that COVID-19, government processing of submittals, and other government-caused delays excused its failure to perform.
  • The government's expert performed a windows analysis attributing 643 calendar days of delay to JAM and 15 calendar days to the government.

Parties

Appellant
J.A.M. Construction Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Naval Facilities Command (NAVFAC) Southeast
Contracting Agency
Naval Facilities Command (NAVFAC) Southeast
Contract Number
N69450-16-D-0605
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.