58175

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

May 13, 2015Judge Scott
Denied / Government PrevailedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Indirect Rates / Incurred CostQuantum / DamagesCDA JurisdictionStatute of Limitations / TimelinessPayment / Progress Payments / FinancingDCAA InvolvedDCMA Involved

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. appealed a contracting officer’s final decision asserting liability for subcontractor costs associated with dining-facility services at site H-3 under a cost-plus-award-fee task order. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Board held that the government’s claim was not barred by the CDA’s six-year statute of limitations, denied KBR’s motion, and granted the government’s cross-motion.

Material Facts

  • The U.S. Army awarded the LOGCAP III indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract, which was novated to KBR on 1 August 2003.
  • The contract required KBR to provide logistical support, including dining-facility services, and allowed task orders on firm-fixed-price or cost-reimbursement bases.
  • The Army issued cost-plus-award-fee Task Order No. 59 for logistics and life-support services supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom, with performance extended through 30 April 2005.
  • KBR awarded Gulf Catering Co. Subcontract No. SK00425 for dining-facility services at site H-3 using fixed monthly prices, labor rates, equipment prices, and headcount-based pricing.
  • On 17 February 2004, the administrative contracting officer directed KBR to use a revised H-3 planning headcount of 1,422 and to adjust population-based services.
  • KBR did not adjust the H-3 subcontract pricing or services to correspond with the 1,422 planning figure.
  • DCAA’s 2005 reviews focused on pricing structures, subcontract terms, headcounts, and billings, and the record did not establish that DCAA then knew KBR had failed to comply with the LOTD.
  • A DCAA auditor testified that DCAA first learned of KBR’s noncompliance with the LOTD in March 2007 through reports obtained from a KBR consultant.
  • KBR notified the government in July 2008 that it had not considered the LOTD’s effect on the subcontract and offered a credit, but later submitted a claim seeking reimbursement of the credit.
  • The contracting officer’s 22 March 2012 final decision determined that H-3 costs were unallowable and demanded payment after accounting for amounts previously withheld.

Parties

Appellant
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army
Contracting Agency
U.S. Army
Contract Number
DAAA09-02-D-0007
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.