Jayco International, LLC
Jayco International, LLC appealed the denial of its claim for payment under a contract for forklift batteries after the Navy terminated the contract for nonconforming goods. The Board denied the government's motion for summary judgment, allowing the appeal to proceed.
Material Facts
- The contract was for forklift batteries to be used on a Navy ship.
- The Navy terminated the contract because the batteries delivered were not the batteries identified in the contract.
- Jayco contended that the Navy modified the contract to allow 'or equal' batteries.
- Jayco delivered batteries that it claimed were equal to those identified in the contract.
- The solicitation incorporated by reference FAR 52.211-6, BRAND NAME OR EQUAL.
- Jayco submitted a quote identifying the products offered as EnerSys batteries.
- The Navy issued a purchase order to Jayco for EnerSys batteries.
- Jayco later ordered Hawker batteries, claiming they were equal to EnerSys batteries.
- The Navy questioned the conformity of the batteries delivered by Jayco.
- The contracting officer ultimately canceled the purchase order, stating it lapsed due to nonconforming goods.
Parties
- Appellant
- Jayco International, LLC
- Respondent Agency
- Military Sealift Command
- Contracting Agency
- Military Sealift Command
- Contract Number
- N40442-11-P-8440
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Metal Trades, Inc.No. 62966November 2, 2021
- Powertronic Systems Florida, Inc.No. 62174October 19, 2021
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783August 5, 2021
- U.S. Pan American Solutions, LLCNo. 62629August 5, 2021
- URS Federal Support Services, Inc.No. 59998-QUANAugust 3, 2021
- G&S Carpet Mills, Inc.No. 62799June 25, 2021
Same Year
- Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Fluor CorporationNo. 59367, 59697December 24, 2014
- The Boeing CompanyNo. 59216December 24, 2014
- Government Services Corp.No. 59654December 23, 2014
- Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59432December 23, 2014
- CAE USA, Inc.No. 58957December 23, 2014
- Metal Storm, Inc.No. 58901December 23, 2014
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026