Parsons Evergreene, LLC
The Air Force moved to partially dismiss Section V of Parsons Evergreene, LLC's certified claim for lack of CDA jurisdiction, arguing that the claim lacked sufficient information and detail. The Board denied the motion, concluding that the claim provided adequate notice of its basis and amount and that the contracting officer in fact conducted a meaningful review.
Material Facts
- Section V concerned Government Management and Administration of the Design-Build Process during the Build Phase and was previously REA No. 8.
- Parsons Evergreene identified Section V as a Modified Total Cost claim involving 22 events.
- The events included structural and design issues, alleged government interference, inspection and material-approval issues, and other construction-related matters.
- The Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment conducted a technical evaluation that discussed each event in a 31-page report with 27 attachments.
- DCAA audited Parsons Evergreene's claim and questioned the vast majority of the claimed costs while relying heavily on the technical analysis.
- The contracting officer considered each element of Section V in a 142-page final decision and denied Section V in its entirety.
- The Air Force's motion was filed after the case was fully litigated and over five years after the Air Force's receipt of the claim.
- The Air Force's motion contained no testimony supporting its contention that the claim failed to provide adequate notice.
Parties
- Appellant
- Parsons Evergreene, LLC
- Respondent Agency
- Air Force
- Contracting Agency
- Air Force
- Contract Number
- FA8903-04-D-8703
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Metal Trades, Inc.No. 62966November 2, 2021
- Powertronic Systems Florida, Inc.No. 62174October 19, 2021
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783August 5, 2021
- U.S. Pan American Solutions, LLCNo. 62629August 5, 2021
- URS Federal Support Services, Inc.No. 59998-QUANAugust 3, 2021
- G&S Carpet Mills, Inc.No. 62799June 25, 2021
Same Year
- AT&T Corp.No. 61868December 21, 2018
- Gilbane Federal Joint VentureNo. 61590December 21, 2018
- WIT Associates, Inc.No. 61547December 19, 2018
- Avis Industries, Inc.No. 61609December 19, 2018
- Tetra Tech Tesoro, Inc.No. 61209, 61210, 61211, 61212 61213, 61214December 19, 2018
- J.F. Brennan Co., Inc.No. 60737December 19, 2018
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026