Maersk Line Limited, Inc.
Maersk Line Limited, Inc. appealed a decision regarding the jurisdiction over Notices of Overcharge issued by the General Services Administration (GSA) under a FAR-based contract. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, affirming its authority under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA).
Material Facts
- The contract was entered into on 30 January 2009 for international cargo transportation services.
- The contract was an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity commercial item contract.
- GSA issued Notices of Overcharge alleging that Maersk overcharged the government for services provided under the contract.
- Maersk submitted a request for a contracting officer's decision regarding the GSA Notices of Overcharge.
- The CO issued a final decision stating he lacked authority to resolve the GSA Notices of Overcharge.
Parties
- Appellant
- Maersk Line Limited, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- General Services Administration
- Contracting Agency
- United States Transportation Command
- Contract Number
- HTC-711-09-D-0040
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- John C. Grimberg Co., Inc.No. 58791, 59717January 2, 2019
- John C. Grimberg Co., Inc.No. 58791, 59167, 59168, 59169, 59170, 59171, 59717October 25, 2018
- CANVS CorporationNo. 57784, 57987September 6, 2018
- K&K Industries, Inc.No. 61189September 5, 2018
- Northrop Grumman CorporationNo. 60190January 9, 2018
- Nelson, Inc.No. 57201, 58166November 8, 2017
Same Year
- Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Fluor CorporationNo. 59367, 59697December 24, 2014
- The Boeing CompanyNo. 59216December 24, 2014
- Government Services Corp.No. 59654December 23, 2014
- Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59432December 23, 2014
- CAE USA, Inc.No. 58957December 23, 2014
- Metal Storm, Inc.No. 58901December 23, 2014
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026